Caped Crusader

Archive for December, 2008|Monthly archive page

Danger of Flu Vaccine on Pregant Women and the Unborn

In Educate before you Vaccinate on December 23, 2008 at 11:10 am

By David Kirby, Huffington Post, October 31, 2008

A new study was just published on the damaging effects of methylmercury on unborn children. It warns that mercury pollution and other environmental toxins may have caused neurological harm — including ADHD and autism — in up to 1-in-10 kids in the world, according to the website Science Daily.

The study, published in the International Journal of Environment and Health, says that the methyl form of organic mercury (found in fish) can harm fetuses at levels that, until now, have been considered to be completely safe.

The finding “suggests that we should take a precautionary approach to this and similar compounds to protect unborn children from irreversible brain damage,” Science Daily writes.

“The researchers say that neurodevelopmental disorders of possible environmental origin affect between 5% and 10% of babies born worldwide, leading to dyslexia, mental retardation, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, cerebral palsy, and autism,” according to the website.

“Researchers believe that the medical world has underestimated the risk of brain damage associated with exposure to this compound (methylmercury) as well as numerous others,” it adds.

The researchers also found that even very small amounts of methylmercury can cause damage to the developing brain, and to a much greater degree than it would in adult brains.

One study author, Philippe Grandjean, of the Department of Environmental Health at Harvard School of Public Health, in Boston, and the University of Southern Denmark in Odense, explained how methylmercury is moved rapidly around to many parts of the body, including the brain. After mercury reaches the brain, “Serious problems will ensue if important developmental processes are blocked, as there will be only one chance for the brain to develop,” the website said.

For almost four years, I have been reporting on the possible connection between mercury (in the environment, and in vaccines) and autism — often despite deep opposition and even ridicule from some quarters.

My research has focused largely on ethylmercury — the other organic form of the metal, which is used in the vaccine preservative thimerosal. There is some evidence to link it to many neurodevelopmental disorders.

Meanwhile, at least three peer-reviewed studies (including one funded by the CDC and published in an NIH journal) have shown an association between inorganic mercury (i.e., from coal) and an increased risk for autism. And recent Federal data show that the percentage of Americans with detectable levels of inorganic mercury in their blood increased eightfold between 2000 and 2004.

And now, we see a published study on a possible association between autism and methylmercury.

My point is, if one type of mercury can produce autism and ADHD, then why couldn’t all three: ethyl, methyl and inorganic? (And now watch the Pharma People blame the Fish People who will blame the Coal People).

A University of Washington study compared injected ethylmercury with ingested methylmercury in infant primates. Researchers found that the vaccine form of organic mercury (ethyl), quickly began converting into inorganic mercury once it crossed the blood-brain barrier, whereas the fish form (methyl) tended to wash in and out of the brain before it could convert to inorganic mercury.

In fact, the vaccine-exposed monkeys had two-to-four times more inorganic mercury deposited in their brains as did the “fish-exposed” monkeys.

Why is this important? Because inorganic mercury, once it gets inside the brain, tends to stay trapped there for decades. Moreover, the same University of Washington team previously showed that inorganic mercury is deposited in certain brain cells, called glial cells. It activates these cells, sometimes after a delayed period of up to six months.

Meanwhile, autopsy studies on autistic brains done at Harvard and Johns Hopkins clearly showed neuro-inflammation associated with activation of glial cells (an avenue for further research).

Many children were exposed to thimerosal prenatally (in the form of Rho-D immune globulin and/or the flu shot), and also at birth, two months, four months, six months, a year, and so on — during a critical and vulnerable period of the brain’s development (which does continue after birth).

If small amounts of methylmercury from fish can cause permanent brain damage in unborn children, and if ethylmercury from vaccines has two-to-four times more potential for causing brain damage in primates, then isn’t time to get rid of thimerosal (in flu shots, in adult vaccines, and in the millions of childhood doses shipped overseas each year?)

“Until there is enough evidence to rule out effects of certain chemicals on the developing nervous system,” Grandjean and the other study authors concluded, “a cautious approach would involve strict regulation of suspected developmental neurotoxicants and prudent counseling of expectant mothers regarding exposures to untested substances.”

Is thimerosal a “suspected neurotoxicant?”

Here is what one manufacturer has to say:

This product contains a chemical known to the State of California to cause birth defects or other reproductive harm.

Another company says that chronic or acute exposure can cause, “constriction of visual fields, impaired hearing, emotional disturbances, spastic movements, incontinence, groaning, shouting, dizziness,” and other problems sometimes found in autism.
Is mercury-containing flu shot an “untested substance?” Here’s what the label for Fluvirin says:

Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with Influenza Virus Vaccine (FLUVIRIN®). It is also not known whether Influenza Virus Vaccine can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. Influenza Virus Vaccine should be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed.

No wonder parents are confused about vaccines today. On one hand, people at Harvard and elsewhere are calling for “strict regulation” of suspected neurotoxins, while mercury-containing flu shots are being urged upon pregnant women and infant children at the mall (and now the voting booth).

If mercury, in any of its forms, causes autism, then we should be keeping it as far away from women and children as humanly possible, in my opinion.

By David Kirby, Huffington Post

Healthy without vaccines

In Educate before you Vaccinate on December 22, 2008 at 1:28 pm

Stay Healthy Without Vaccines

Thanks to Dr. Jay for part of this! ~~Dr Sherri Tenpenny

In the 1960s, children received dozens fewer vaccines than children in 2008. If children receive all recommended vaccines, they now receive 69 vaccine antigens and milligrams of chemicals by six months of age; they receive 113 by kindergarten. With all the teen boosters, including the new Gardasil vaccine, girls will have 145 vaccine antigens injected into their bodies by 10 years of age. Can that possibly be “safe” and “effective”?

  

The infant immune system is immature. Doctors treat sick babies completely differently than the way they treat sick toddlers, partly because infants can be overwhelmed by an infection which might not have caused a problem to a three-year-old or in an adult.

When drugs are given, the doses are calculated according to the weight of the child.

Vaccination is the only area of medicine where a six-week-old baby and a 150 pound adult get the same dose of a medication. This is absurd and dangerous medicine. An adult’s exposure to aluminum or to dose of 25 micrograms of mercury from the flu shot or the tetanus shot is bad enough, but giving those dosages to a seven year old child whose weight is less than one-third of an adult should be malpractice.

The immune system confronts many organisms on a daily basis. If you have pets, your baby crawling across the living room carpet is exposed to millions of microbes in 15 minutes.

Why fear “vaccine preventable disease” with such terror? There is no need. Your baby’s immune system responds to those bugs with antibodies and by defensive molecules in the mouth, the nose, the throat, the bronchi and gut.

Vaccines completely bypass the body’s first lines of defense and disrupt the body’s barrier to the world: the skin – and then they disrupt the integrity of the rest of the immune system.

Vaccines are injected directly into muscle or under the skin with the intent of getting the viral or bacterial response directly in the blood stream.

This amazingly unscientific approach is assumed to be “safe” and “effective” throughout the long history of vaccination and the doctors (who benefit financially) continue to administer them with false assurances of safety.

Immunization is a 200 year old false-premise and vaccination is a 200 year, money-making mistake.

The phrases “evidence-based medicine” and “science-based research” are catchy but lose meaning when you realize that the “published scientists” (i.e. doctors in organizations with important but meaningless names, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Infectious Diseases Society of America) are sponsored by the manufacturers of vaccines.

The conferences, lunches, speaking fees, airline tickets, hotels, rental cars and much more are funded by the pharmaceutical industry. Have a look at the home page of any drug company under the “Career Development and Funding Opportunities” page, their “Research Awards” page, or the countless pages of advertisements for vaccines in the medical journals. Science? Maybe. Unbiased science? Not even close.

Dr. Bernadine Healy, the former head of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has broken ranks with the her fellow scientists in the discussion about vaccines causing or increasing the incidence of autism. Dr. Bernadine Healy is the former head of the National Institutes of Health, and the most well-known medical voice yet to break with her colleagues on the vaccine-autism question. In an exclusive interview with CBS News, Healy said the question is still open.

The cumulative amount of aluminum in vaccines is vastly higher than it’s ever been before. Aluminum damages human brain cells and is used as an ‘adjuvant’ or irritant to allow the manufacturer to use less of the antigen itself. That is, a pertussis vaccine might have less ‘pertussis’ protein than before but it is a dangerous brain irritant. And now, they are considering giving the pertussis vaccine at birth, along with the hepatitis B vaccine. Certainly, researchers and doctors are more concerned about antibodies than they are about functioning brains.

The drug companies have little or no respect for parents and children. Their greed is the root of much of the evil that currently exists in the medical industry and the status of health in this country. Vaccines are the economic loss leaders for their industry. Relatively inexpensive vaccines help generate the billions made from drugs are used to treat the asthma, allergies, seizure disorders, cancer, diabetes, etc etc that are a result of vaccination. 

This is the only area of medicine where we deny side effects.

If Amoxicillin for a bladder infection causes a rash, diarrhea, cramps and the often inevitable yeast infection, doctors apologize and correct the problem.

Six vaccines given at the same time to a ten pound baby? Doctors tell you before the shots that vaccines are safe and have no side effects. And that the subsequent eczema, seizures, deaths and autism are coincidental and absolutely unrelated to the vaccines.

Even worse, doctors blame the “defective child” for having the reaction or the bad genes from the parents that were birthed with the “defective child.”

Yes, children still get illnesses which vaccines may have prevented but I have tracked reports of outbreaks for years. The intensity and number of illnesses pales in comparison to the number of children damaged by the current vaccination schedule.

Parents need to let go of their fear of measles. Talk to adults who had measles when they were kids. It wasn’t so bad – I know: I had measles, mumps and chickenpox all in the third grade. Yes, I was sick for a couple of weeks but it passed. And I attribute much of my adult health today to the fact that my immune system experienced the Right of Passage, normal childhood illnesses when I was a child.

The time has come for focusing on HEALTH and not “disease prevention.”

 Simple things work:

 1. Avoid white sugar, white flour and GMO foods.

 2. Drink lots of fresh, purified water (get rid of sugar-laden juices and soda pops).

 3. Eat plant-based, whole foods. Eat as much organic food as you can afford, but particularly stick with organic for meats and eggs. For picky eaters, get whole food vitamins from companies such as Juice Plus, Mannatech, Nordic Naturals or Kirkman.

Yummy Apples

Yummy Apples

 

 4. Get your kids outside to run, play and exercise.  Vitamin D has been found to be one of the best immune system supporters and anti-cancer nutrients in the world. Innate protection from disease.

 

5. Get your kids to bed on time!! They need 10 hours of sleep every night. Enforced bedtimes will do more for your children (and your relationships) than just about anything else you can do.

123-5801

 

 

 

Please note:

All of these recommendations also apply to adult health!

We have multi-generational indoctrination about the need for vaccines.  Think of how difficult it was to convince people that the sun did not circumnavigate the earth. Or that the world was indeed round, not flat.

Be part of the solution. Keep your kids – and yourself – healthy without vaccines

1982 vs Current Vaccine Schedule

1982 vs Current Vaccine Schedule

Rape of Utah

In Earth Offenders, Politics on December 22, 2008 at 11:11 am

Stopping Bush’s Destruction of Our Environment

Robert Redford

Beautiful Utah

Beautiful Utah

Actor, Director, and Environmental Activist

Democracy is working. At least that’s the news for now from my friends at the Natural Resources Defense Council, which has filed a lawsuit against last-minute Bush administration plans to lease huge swaths of majestic wilderness in Utah for oil and gas extraction.

Late last night, NRDC and a coalition of environmental and preservation groups filed an agreement with the Bureau of Land Management that could save 100,000 acres of pristine land that are endangered. The deal temporarily prevents the Bureau from issuing leases on 80 contested parcels of Utah wilderness, including land adjacent to national parks, for 30 days (until January 19).

Although the Bureau will go forward with the auction today, based on the agreement it will not issue the contested leases. The delay will give a federal court time to hear the case.

As I’ve written previously, words alone cannot do justice to the beauty of these places, but they do capture the absurdity of the Bush plan. Oil and gas drilling in Desolation Canyon? Industrial development along the meandering Green River? The thought makes one wince.

Utah’s Red Rock country is one of America’s few remaining wilderness treasures. It’s our land, it’s our legacy, but will it still be here for our children and grandchildren?

The Bureau’s agreement has delayed the potential destruction. We will now get our day in court and I know that NRDC, the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA) and their partners will continue to do all they can to protect Utah’s unspoiled landscapes.

Peet sold her soul to Big Pharma… awwwww

In Earth Offenders, Educate before you Vaccinate, Politics on December 21, 2008 at 2:05 pm

Amanda Peet, How Much Are They Paying You?

 

Stickin' it to ya!

Stickin' it to ya!

By J.B. Handley

I hadn’t really been paying attention, until an alert AoA reader pointed out a sentence buried in the VaccinateYourBaby website (that features Amanda Peet as the campaign spokesperson):

“Every Child By Two’s Vaccinate Your Baby campaign is made possible through an unrestricted, educational grant from sanofi pasteur.”

For those of you new to this debate, “sanofi pasteur” (why did they put it in small caps?) is a vaccine company. I guess “educational grant” is intended to throw people of the scent that Sanofi is paying someone to endorse a product from which they profit immensely. We already know that Every Child By Two is largely funded by Wyeth, another vaccine company. (Read “ECBT: A Front Group for Wyeth” HERE.)

Sanofi Pasteur, according to their own website, is a division of Sanofi Aventis Group, and is “the largest company in the world devoted entirely to human vaccines.” Sanofi Aventis’ Market Cap (total value of the stock) is $85.2 Billion dollars. In 2007, they had revenues of $43 Billion dollars and made $8.4 billion in net profits. Their vaccine division is responsible for about $5 billion of their revenues and grew almost 15% between 2006 and 2007.

Which leads me to a simple question: Is Amanda Peet a spokesperson for VaccinateYourBaby out of the goodness of her heart?

While Sanofi seeks to protect its annual $5 billion in revenues from the greatest threat to vaccine growth – autism – is Amanda Peet just playing good Samaritan? Does she tell her friends she is involved in a nonprofit venture?

There is no doubt in the world that Amanda Peet is a paid spokesperson for a vaccine maker. There is also no doubt that in her interactions with the press she will do her best to pretend her work is humanitarian and to somehow equate what she is doing with what Jenny is doing.

Jenny has an “angry mob” of tens of thousands of parents who agree with everything she says and does. Amanda Peet has an Italian-suited army of vaccine makers standing behind her.

So, I just want to know: How much, Amanda Peet, did they pay you to sell your soul?

JB Handley is co-founder of Generation Rescue and a contributor to Age of Autism.

A Mother Warrior
A Mother Warrior

Amanda Peet makes my skin crawl… My thoughts are this.. who calls the patent holder on a vaccine to do their research? Who asks for reassurance from a Dr. who made a vaccine that killed many children? How can Ms. Peet sleep at night? How can she endorse this mind boggling schedule of poisons, let alone stand next to Offit in public? ~Ant Bethany

Gardasil, Prizes, and Bribes, Oh My!

In Educate before you Vaccinate, Gardasil reactions and injuries, Politics on December 15, 2008 at 2:30 pm

HPV Virus Infects the Nobel Prize Committee?

By Kent Heckenlively, Esq.

Just when you thought things couldn’t get any stranger, comes a story from Newsmax that “The Nobel Prize Committee is facing criminal investigation of bribery and corruption after allegedly taking huge payments from a pharmaceutical company that directly benefits from the work of this year’s Nobel Prize in medicine.”  (Newsmax, December 12, 2008, “Swedish Officials Investigating Nobel Prize Board”)

According to the Swedish trade journal Dagen Medicina, Nobel Media and Nobel Webb, (Nobel affiliated corporations) are accused of taking “many millions” of dollars from Astra-Zeneca, which holds patents for the two human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines on the market, Gardasil in the United States, and Cerverix in Europe.

According to the Swedish prosecutor in the case, Christer van der Kwast, “The criminal charges that may become formalized are bribery and corruption.”

The 2008 Nobel Prize in Medicine was given to German scientist Harald zur Hauser for his discovery of the human papilloma virus and its link to cervical cancer. 

In response to the accusations, AstraZeneca spokesman Zhou Yi claimed the company had no influence on the selection of the Nobel Prize, and its only connection was to the two Nobel subcommittees, Nobel Media and Nobel Webb, organizations which get the word out globally about “the benefits of medical breakthroughs.” 

According to the Newsmax article, however, “Yi did confirm that AstraZeneca board member Bo Angelina also sits on the committee that votes on Nobel candidates, but said it was still unclear whether he had actually voted for Hauser.”

Let’s break this down, because at times it seems like one of those plots from “Mission Impossible.”

A pharmaceutical representative from AstraZeneca sits on a board which votes on Nobel Prize candidates in medicine.  That board voted for Dr. Hauser because of his discovery that the human papilloma virus causes cervical cancer.  In turn, AstraZeneca gave several million dollars to Nobel-affiliated corporations to spread the word about “medical breakthroughs.”  Just by coincidence, the vaccine patents against the human papilloma virus are owned by AstraZeneca.

Maybe a few positive words from the Nobel committee might be just enough to make some parents ignore all those reports about bad reactions, including death from the Gardasil vaccine.

Or am I reading too much into a potential criminal charge against a pharmaceutical company?  Maybe it’s all just a terrible misunderstanding.

Kent Heckenlively is Legal Editor of Age of Autism

http://www.ageofautism.com/2008/12/bribing-the-nob.html#more

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.